Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/03/Category:Images from external sources with admin-reviewed licenses
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The word "admin" in the category is not always true, since also LicenseReviewers can review files. Should perhaps be renamed to something like "trusted user reviewed" or soemthing. Josve05a (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe "Images from external sources with reviewed licenses" is better, as when a license is reviewed it is implicit that it was done by an administrator or by an image reviewer. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right, but move 64000+ files therefore? Hm. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- All that will be needed is a change in the template and a purge... Josve05a (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Right, categorising via templates doesn't work well for many months, maybe it works, but I suspect a complete purge or touch run will be necessary which would need 100+ hours at 10/minute. --Achim (talk) 08:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- All that will be needed is a change in the template and a purge... Josve05a (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right, but move 64000+ files therefore? Hm. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Move No matter how long it takes to update pages, sooner or later they will. If the change had been made in March, probably it would be complete. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 07:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Not all files are images, therefore I'd suggest using Files from external sources with reviewed licenses. FDMS 4 09:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Move FDMS4's suggestion seems perfect to me. @Josve05a: This CFD is almost a year old with no actual opposition. Can you implement this change? Unless Achim55 objetcs of course. I do a large number of the reviews, and I'm not an admin, so marking these as admin reviewed is inaccurate in the case of several thousand of my reviews alone. lNeverCry 22:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm fine with FDMS4's suggestion and don't oppose. --Achim (talk) 22:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Done: Moved. Trying to change templates now. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)