Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/01/Category:Ipernity review needed
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This cat is rarely used, if ever. There is no need for this specific license review category, a normal license review tag/procedure is just fine Josve05a (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- So what's your suggestion? Lupo 14:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete this cat and subcat. Josve05a (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- And what about template {{Ipernityreview}}? And change flinfo? What for? At least keep the template and its interface, but make the template categorize somewhere else, then. I
Oppose any change that requires me to change the code of flinfo. Lupo 14:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- We can depricate {{Ipernityreview}}
and make it redirect to {{License review}}. Same parameters, simple.Josve05a (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)- As far as I see, they do not have the same parameters. Lupo 17:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- How many images are we talking about that is using fileinfo for images from this website? Any idea? We can make the template categorize in the normal lr category, even though I doubt that it will be that many, if any at all. Josve05a (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- I presume you mean "flinfo" when you write "fileinfo". Flinfo doesn't keep logs, so I don't know how frequently people use flinfo to transfer images from ipernity. Making the template categorize into the normal license review categories is an approach. Just make sure the few hundred file description pages using this currently don't get broken. Once that template has been changed properly, then the ipernity-specific categories (but not the template) could be removed. Lupo 19:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- How many images are we talking about that is using fileinfo for images from this website? Any idea? We can make the template categorize in the normal lr category, even though I doubt that it will be that many, if any at all. Josve05a (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- As far as I see, they do not have the same parameters. Lupo 17:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Added {{Empty category}} just in case on the subcat. But mw:Template:EmptyCatGood would be funnier.
Keep, cf. WP:BROKE. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- We can depricate {{Ipernityreview}}
- And what about template {{Ipernityreview}}? And change flinfo? What for? At least keep the template and its interface, but make the template categorize somewhere else, then. I
- Keep' its active during certain times, in 2014 around this time, tht cat had over 30 images to be reviewed..--Stemoc 23:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Not done: Lack of consensus for deletion of this category. --Achim (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)