Jump to content

User talk:Rbrechko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

User talk page archives:

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0014 Pryozerne Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0037 Pidhirtsi Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0012 Bratkivtsi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0170 Pidhaitsi Mitskevich Monument RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted (seems that you used the crooked signpost on the right as a reference instead of the buildings in background) --Plozessor 05:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 10:24, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now, thx! --Plozessor 18:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Paraskeva church, Berezhnytsia, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0005 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 12:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0013 Verchany Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0007 Horozhanka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0002 Budkiv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted --Poco a poco 08:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. Fixed and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 10:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0004 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0040 Rozhirche Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0052 Vyshnivets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bortnyky Vikovi Lypy RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2025!

-- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezhyrichchia Wooden Church RB 46-215-0038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 10:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0010 Buchach Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for 2025!

[edit]
  * Happy Holidays, Rbrechko! *  
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
  • Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2025!

Pierre André (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2025!

[edit]
Happy holidays
Rbrechko!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2025!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yazlovets Castle, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Yosypovychi, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0038 Trybukhivtsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0034 Pykulovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0002 Buchach Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dibrova Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0009 Berezhnytsia Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhydachiv Castle Settlement RB 46-215-0126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0001 Verchany Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:32, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0044 Pidhaitsi Mitskevycha 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Hlukhovychi, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilian monastery in Buchach, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nemyriv Park V RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0007 Buchach Church of the Intercession RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Crops left and right should be improved --Poco a poco 02:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. I deployed new version. --Rbrechko 13:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Костел Успіння, Язловець, вхід SW, 2012 (Rbrechko, 61-212-0018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

З Новим роком!

[edit]
One of the Three Wise Men/Kings/Magi with his camel, detail of the nativity scene in the Saint Peter and Paul church, Weil der Stadt ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Щасливого Різдва!
З Новим роком!

Hello Roman Brechko,
thank you very much for your great contributions to Wikimedia Commons! All the best,
Roman Eisele / Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bilokrynytsia Palace, view from above..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-0014 Lelekhivka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dub Vyhovskoho RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NNP Yavorivskyi Table RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would be helpful to add the nomination words in English at least into the image caption, if not perhaps also into the description. --Scotch Mist 07:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Citypark RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nimchych RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0008 Buchach St Mykolai Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0006 Buchach Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Well number 6, view from E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel for Khotyn victory, view from E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velykyi Lubin Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dibrova Reserve Table RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NNP Hutsulshchyna RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pechera Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lvivskyi Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0010 Berezhnytsia Outhouse RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0014 Pidzamochok Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lviv Stryiskyi Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bania Lysovetska Wellspring N6 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-5006 Bania Lysovetska RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-248-5023 Popadia RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0016 Yazlovets Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0015 Pryozerne Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A lot of CA around the leaves. --Plozessor 04:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. Deployed new version. --Rbrechko 20:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but actually can't see a difference, the CA is there as before. --Plozessor 05:25, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Hmm. Could you tell me what kind of CA (at least color) you see and place where it is? Because I can't find anything critical. --Rbrechko 16:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, the purple stuff here, similar in the upper right corner. --Plozessor 07:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Hopefully I fixed it this time. New version has been uploaded. --Rbrechko 15:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Acceptable now, thx! --Plozessor 19:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0049 Buchach Statue of Virgin Mary RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0023 Buchach Shevchenka 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RLP Dnistrovskyi Canyon RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medova Pechera RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Yosypovychi, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0050 Vyshnivets Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0005 Vyshnivets Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0006 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0008 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0093 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0018 Zbarazh Church of the Resurrection RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0044 Zbarazh School RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0022 Zbarazh Nezalezhnosti 25 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Presentation of Mary, Stankivtsi, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Ascension, Mezhyrichchia, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0020 Cherche Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0004 Pidhirtsi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0006 Strilkiv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 02:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source №1 «Boniface», view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the church of the Beheading of Saint John the Baptist, Stare Selo, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Lelekhivka, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brody synagogue RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Btspurplegalaxy 03:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bibrka Shevchenka 7 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piatnychany Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhvanets Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit grainy sky but still ok. --Plozessor 04:39, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0054 Vyshnivets Monastery Gates RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:58, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarnoruda Catholic Church 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Palace 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Transfiguration, Bratkivtsi, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0095 Ustechko Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0099 Ustechko Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0070 Sadky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0032 Rozdil Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0019 Anhelivka Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0062 Nyrkiv Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:51, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-5001 Drohobych Khmelnytskoho Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:18, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist, Ivanivtsi, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary, Anhelivka, Chortkiv Raion (OCU), view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0005 Nahoriany Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0103 Shutromyntsi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:07, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0096 Ustechko Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0053 Vyshnivets Trinity Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please try to reduce the noise in the sky a bit --Michielverbeek 07:46, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I reduced noise in the sky and uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 12:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me now --Michielverbeek 06:42, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-5021 Porohova Rock RB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0047 Dorohychivka Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0029 Rozdil Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:05, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0053 Busk St Mykolai Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0386 Shutromyntsi WW2 Monument RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-9001 Zbarazh Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-253-0009 Steblivka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Would probably have cropped slightly distracting branch and telegraph pole on left but good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Nezalezhnosti Street, Zbarazh, view from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0027 Obroshyno Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0050 Shchyrets Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0049 Shchyrets Catholic Church Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0041 Semyhyniv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0017 Zaklad Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0016 Olesko Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0097 Ustechko Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Otherwise good but  Underexposed. --Plozessor 04:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I uploaded new version. Is it better now? --Rbrechko 14:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, thx! Good now! --Plozessor 05:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-0003 Zbarazh Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:30, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Source № 4 (Materi Bozhoyi), view from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0005 Vidnyky Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-0009 Vyshnia Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Kanusyak, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khotyn Fortress RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0023 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 8 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0073 Pidhaitsi Shevchenka 28 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0071 Pidhaitsi Shevchenka 24 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0052 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 6 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0051 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 5 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0011 Hryniv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0006 Vidnyky Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catholic church in Ustechko, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0023 Lisnevychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0020 Kotsuriv Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0019 Kotsuriv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0002 Monastyryska Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-204-0063 Kuriany Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 00:37, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-204-0067 Litiatyn Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0024 Lisnevychi Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-0030 Rozdil Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok. --Kallerna 09:09, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Resurrection of Christ, Sadky, Chortkiv Raion, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church, Nahoriany, Ternopil Oblast (UGCC), view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-0041 Lviv Bandery 12 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-227-0003 Chynadiyevo Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-240-0001 Svaliava Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0010 Negrovets Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0015 Dmytrovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0016 Dmytrovychi Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church, Semyhyniv, view from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-0079 Velykyi Liubin Wellspring N1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-0076 Velykyi Liubin Sanatorium Administrative Building RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-0019 Zhulyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Some PC required? --Scotch Mist 08:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 20:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-220-0060 Nahoriany Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The church is too dark. --Plozessor 04:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Is it better now? --Rbrechko 14:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Better but noisy. If your PS version supports that, I'd perform AI denoise, increase overall expore and decrease exposure of the sky. --Plozessor 05:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tried to reduce noise and to do other manipulations. I hope it looks better now. --Rbrechko 14:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Brightness is ok but it's (still) pretty noisy and now there's color banding and some strange transitions in the sky. --Plozessor 06:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done The last try. Uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 20:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx, IMO acceptable now! --Plozessor 17:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Presentation of Virgin Mary, Dorohychivka (OCU), view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-242-0078 Mezhyrich Oven RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 00:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-0032 Skala Podilska Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 00:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-246-0050 Toky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 68-242-0083 Samchyky Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 00:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-107-0041 Kremenets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:05, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 07:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-246-0037 Medyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 07:19, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-5009 Rozhirche Rocks RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 08:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Apostle church, Skoryky (OCU), view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-232-0040 Otyniya Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-252-0078 Horishnie Zaluchchia Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-252-0003 Sniatyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0009 Negrovets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-107-0003 Morshyn Marble Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-205-0001 Vyzhenka Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0007 Kolochava Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-252-0038 Sniatyn Shevchenka 141 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 07-208-0218 Berestechko Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Taras Shevchenko Street, Pidhaitsi, view from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church, Stare Misto, view from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0013 Pylypets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0014 Pylypets Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 05-243-0098 Pechera Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0245 Dubno Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-104-0028 Mukachevo Townhall RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 73-210-0002 Bila Krynytsia Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-224-0016 Podobovets Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Cosmas and Damian church, Vyshnia, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0218 Dubno Monastery RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0214 Dubno Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:56-242-0070 Mezhyrich Monastery RB 24.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:56-242-0070 Mezhyrich Monastery RB 24.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Paraskeva church, Kuriany, Ternopil Oblast, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhydachiv Catholic Church RB 46-215-0007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-0013 Yaniv Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0217 Dubno Gate RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0216 Dubno Ostrozki Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-103-0215 Dubno Luibimyrski Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church, Nahoriany, Ternopil Oblast (OCU), view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-0012 Yaniv Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Simeon Stylites church, Kotsuriv, view from NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Simeon Stylites church, Kotsuriv, view from NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-242-0070 Mezhyrich Monastery RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0056 Rohatyn Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0055 Rohatyn Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 01:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-101-1228 Lviv Pasichna 36 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-1137 Drohobych Shevchenka 23 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-1041 Drohobych Franka 36 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-2023 Drohobych Mitskevych Monument RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-0006 Drohobych Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-106-1149 Drohobych Trinity Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --TypeInfo 04:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0007 Rohatyn Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mamaivtsi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luzhany Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-215-5012 Livchytsi Alley of Age-old Lindens and Oaks RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0013 Pidhirtsi Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-251-0025 Stara Sil Catholic Church Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zhydachiv Belfry RB 46-215-0008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Intercession, Medyn, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Monastyryska, Ukraine - east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lukivtsi Nikolas Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toporivtsi Church 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:50, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Skala-Podilska, Ukraine, view from N..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:46-233-0009 Svirzh Castle RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budenets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storozhynets Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storozhynets Rathaus RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toporivtsi Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toporivtsi Church 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-203-0019 Pidkamin Column RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Paraskeva church, Zhulyn, Ukraine, view from NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budenets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 19:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0004 Rohatyn Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but slightly dark imo. --ArildV 12:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded new version. Is it better now? --Rbrechko 23:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint George church, Hryniv, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church, Hryniv, Ukraine, view from E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyzhnytsia Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyzhnytsia Myru 13 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bila Krynytsia Assumption Cathedral Old Believers RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bila Krynytsia Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyzhenka Chapel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.
 Comment - really like your photos but not being familiar with Ukraine or Ukrainian would welcome the addition of location data and\or your QI description in English copied to the caption or description of each image - such additional info will also be appreciated by others outside of Ukraine. --Scotch Mist 08:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thank you. I'll try not to forget to do that. --Rbrechko 17:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyzhenka Nicholas Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyzhenka Church of St Ioann of Suceava RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Simeon Stylites church, Lisnevychi, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulmo Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-233-0010 Svirzh Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyzhnytsia Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khreshchatyk Monastery 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khreshchatyk Monastery 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mamaivtsi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Judging from the fence, this needs slight perspective correction. (Otherwise it's very good.) --Plozessor 04:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 00:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panka Wooden Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This needs PC too. --Plozessor 04:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 00:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brunitski Palace in Pidhirtsi (near Stryi), Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0006 Rohatyn Holy Spirit Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0037 Pomoniata Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (Seems that many elements are crooked there; it seems that the picture is straight and not leaning.) --Plozessor 04:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-212-0059 Halych Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0036 Porokhova Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel with an inscription about the abolition of serfdom in Bukovina, village of Vyzhenka, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:61-224-9002 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:61-224-9002 Vyshnivets Palace RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skalat Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarnoruda Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skoryky Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0001 Rohatyn St Mykolai Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0003 Rohatyn St Mykolai Church Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0036 Busk Court RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 10:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church, Strilky (near Bibrka), Ukraine, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozhysk Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 03:13, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toky Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luzhany Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --The Blue Rider 17:15, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:80-391-9007 Kyiv St.Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery RB 18.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:80-391-9007 Kyiv St.Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery RB 18.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Cart (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial, Shutromyntsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk Rail Station RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:47, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klymkivtsi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorofiivka Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk Angel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry of the church of the Dormition, Zhydachiv, Ukraine, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Zhydachiv, Ukraine, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk Halytskoho 37 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:21, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koropets Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk Halytskoho 82 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint George church, Rohatyn, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 6, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk Hotel RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sataniv Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk Magistrate RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:17, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyshnia Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:23, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velykyi Lubin Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulyholove Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monastyryska Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:46, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarnoruda Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church, Dorofiyivka, Ukraine, view from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stara Sil Bell Tower of the Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-248-0004 Nevytske Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21-101-0065 Uzhgorod Synagugue RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0005 Vysoke Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidvolochysk MDB RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some blue CA otherwise fine. --ArildV 20:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I've fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko 20:56, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, thank you --ArildV 07:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael church, Rozhysk, Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stara Sil Church of St Paraskeva RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stara Sil Bell Tower of the Church of St Paraskeva RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0011 Korzhova Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0023 Pidlisne Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0057 Horodyslavychi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Not good lighting. I'm surprised at the enthusiasm for the photo. -- Spurzem 12:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC) /> Comment Enthusiasm is your word. For me, a review is about whether the image meets the criteria for QI or not.--ArildV 13:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Baptist in Pidlisne, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 5, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaliztsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zaliztsi Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 01:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0013 Zolotyi Potik Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Basil in Vysoke, Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить фольклор 2025: завантажуйте фото, відео та аудіо нематеріальної культурної спадщини України!

[edit]

Цікавитеся традиціями та маєте фото чи відео народних святкувань, танців, записи співів чи майстрів традиційних мистецтв за роботою? Тоді запрошуємо до конкурсу «Вікі любить фольклор»!

З 1 лютого по 31 березня 2025 року завантажуйте світлини, відео та аудіо нематеріальної культурної спадщини у Вікісховище та долучайтеся до її популяризації.

«Вікі любить фольклор» — це міжнародний конкурс, метою якого є документування народних традицій, вбрання, танців, співів, святкувань та обрядів, щоб наповнити Вікіпедію якісними зображеннями для ілюстрування статей. Щоб взяти участь, перейдіть на сторінку «Вікі любить фольклор».

Три найкращі світлини отримають цінні призи та сувеніри на українському етапі конкурсу. Три учасники чи учасниці, які своїми фото проілюструють найбільше статей Вікіпедії та інших вікіпроєктів, також отримають призи в українській частині конкурсу. Всі фото, відео та аудіо будуть брати участь у міжнародному змаганні.

Цього року у конкурсі є спецномінація «Українська кухня», присвячена традиційним українським стравам. Авторів трьох найкращих фото буде відзначено окремо.

Важливо! Для участі в конкурсі необхідно вказати детальний опис фольклорної цінності матеріалів (назва події чи обряду, хто виконує/бере участь, місце, дата тощо).

Також з 1 лютого по 31 березня проходить конкурс статей «Фемінізм та фольклор 2025» — щорічна міжнародна ініціатива у межах кампанії «Вікі любить фольклор», що спрямована на висвітлення культурного розмаїття та гендерної інклюзивності у Вікіпедії.

Долучайтеся до конкурсу та допоможіть зберегти українську культурну спадщину для майбутніх поколінь!

Українська частина конкурсу відбувається за підтримки ГО «Вікімедіа Україна». Ви отримали це повідомлення, бо брали участь у фотоконкурсах організації раніше. --Олена Вінсент [ВМУА] (від імені організаційної команди конкурсу) 14:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Demetrius church, Litiatyn, Ukraine, view from S..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horodyslavychi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:50, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budkiv Bell Tower of Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budkiv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hlukhovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chyshky Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chyshky Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus church, Tarnoruda, Ukraine, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:73-250-0001 Khotyn Fortress RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0025 Busk Synagogue RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:34, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dmytrovychi Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dmytrovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:12, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hryniv Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building on Taras Shevchenko Street 34, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-242-0007 Rudky Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-242-0008 Rudky Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-206-0001 Busk St Paraskeva Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hryniv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but slightly tilted (tower is leaning to the left) --Plozessor 05:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. I uploaded new version. I hope it looks better now. --Rbrechko 18:45, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes! Good quality. --Plozessor 17:49, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-0028 Zolotyi Potik Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Do you think you can retouch the person? Otherwise that picture is good. --Plozessor 04:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Retouched. --Rbrechko 01:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thx! Good quality. --Plozessor 17:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Monastyryska, Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0072 Pidhaitsi Shevchenka 26 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0040 Pidhaitsi Mitskevycha 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0031 Obroshyno Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:54, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0029 Obroshyno Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kotsuriv Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:58, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-242-0006 Vysoke Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Perhaps could have cropped top of image but good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Paraskeva church, Stara Sil, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Adam Mitskevych Street 8, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:26-216-0028 Rakovets Castle RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:26-216-0028 Rakovets Castle RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zalisky Wooden Church RB 46-215-0027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0041 Pidhaitsi Mitskevycha 4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zarichchia Church RB 46-215-0028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Demetrius church in Horodyslavychi, Ukraine, view from NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sydoriv Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sydoriv Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kudryntsi Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Fortress RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voronovytsia Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:02, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voronovytsia Palace 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:02, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borodchytsi Wooden Church RB 46-215-0012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems leaning to the left. --Plozessor 04:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. I uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 01:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok now! --Plozessor 06:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint Nicholas church in Chyshky, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Lviv Gate RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kryvche Castle 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vysichka Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kotsuriv Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Appears slightly tilted! --Scotch Mist 11:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 00:56, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Theotokos in Zarichia near Zhydachiv, Ukraine, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Kamianets Gate RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Shafts RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kryvche Castle 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption, Rudky, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0026 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 13 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kryvche Castle 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Kamianets Gate RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Palace RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okopy Shafts RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kryvche Castle 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2025: долучайтесь до Місячника ілюстрування української природи та отримуйте призи!

[edit]

10 лютого розпочався Місячник ілюстрування української природи у 2025 році!

Він триватиме до 10 березня 2025 року та організовується громадською організацією «Вікімедіа Україна».

Місячник ілюстрування української природи — це проєкт, присвячений ілюструванню української Вікіпедії та Вікіданих світлинами, завантаженими за десять років проведення української частини міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю».

З 2013 року у межах цього конкурсу учасники та учасниці завантажили на Вікісховище понад 125 тисяч світлин пам’яток природи України. Багато з них ще не знайшли свого місця на відповідних сторінках Вікіпедії. Відповідно, у цій кампанії беруть участь лише фотографії з української частини фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю».

Долучитися можуть усі зареєстровані користувачі та користувачки Вікіпедії. Для цього:

  • проілюструйте принаймні одну статтю української Вікіпедії чи один елемент Вікіданих фотографією з конкурсу «Вікі любить Землю»;
  • додайте себе у розділ «Учасники та внесок» на сторінці проєкту;
  • регулярно додавайте свій внесок у той розділ згідно із системою балів.

За результатами кампанії 5 найактивніших учасників та учасниць конкурсу отримають цінні призи від організаторів — сертифікати інтернет-магазинів. Усі учасники й учасниці також зможуть отримати офіційний сертифікат участі від «Вікімедіа Україна», а також сувеніри із символікою Вікіпедії та «Вікі любить Землю».

Більше інформації про участь, призи, поради з ілюстрування читайте на сторінці кампанії. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:80-391-5003 Kyiv Volodymyrska Hirka RB.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:80-391-5003 Kyiv Volodymyrska Hirka RB.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Adam Mitskevych Street 3, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Anthony, Zaliztsi, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-9001 Malyi Liubin Complex of Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0058 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 14a RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0057 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 14 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khodoriv Palace RB 46-215-0053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0021 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:33, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0063 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 25 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Intercession, Nyrkiv, Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0050 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0047 Pidhaitsi Townhall RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-236-0040 Stavchany Wooden Belfry RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voronovytsia Palace 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:50, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-242-0009 Rudky Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:50, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church, Borodchytsi, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0039 Pidhaitsi Mitskevycha 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skala-Podilska Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael church, Zalisky, Ukraine, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chynadiyevo Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ustechko Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Losiach Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church, Hryniv, Ukraine, view from SW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Negrovets Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 14, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle in Chynadiiovo, Ukraine, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0055 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 11 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 01:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0065 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 30 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 01:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0053 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 7 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0025 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 11 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:45, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilhivtsi Wooden Church RB 46-215-0016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verbytsia Wooden Church RB 46-215-0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:08, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0049 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Запрошення до Commons Photographers User Group

[edit]

Привіт Романе!
Пропоную приєднатися до групи Commons:Commons Photographers User Group
та для цього додати рядок про себе до таблиці Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Membership list.
З повагою, Георгій -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Municipality Hall, Pidvolochysk, Ukraine, view from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint Michael church, Stavchany, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0054 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 10 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RLP Dnistrovskyi RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Bellfry RB 46-215-0052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:08, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Church RB 46-215-0051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 10:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilhivtsi Monument RB 46-215-0080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:29, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krainykovo Dub RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:50, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podobovets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:50, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0056 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 13 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidhoretskyi Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyshnia Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korolevo Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tovste Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 4, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church, Pomoniata, Ukraine, view from W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:46-236-0032 Pisky Church RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:46-236-0032 Pisky Church RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krainykovo Wellspring N1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pylypets Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svaliava Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0024 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podobovets Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Children's playground in the sanatorium park in Shklo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo has been published on multiple copyright-protected sites, see:

https://www.wisst-ihr-noch.de/90er/diese-12-spiele-haben-wir-damals-auf-dem-spielplatz-gespielt-80897/

https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/swings-on-children-playground-under-sun-1139711900

https://www.origo.hu/nagyvilag/2020/06/berugott-majd-elrabolt-egy-idegen-gyereket-a-jatszoterrol-egy-ferfi-nemetorszagban

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 15:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Children's playground in the sanatorium park in Shklo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnolia677 (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Budkiv, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial sign to the abolition of serfdom in Zarichia, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voloshchyna Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velyki Hlibovychi Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velyki Hlibovychi Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strilky Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krainykovo Wellspring N1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pylypets Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svaliava Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:33, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stara Kotelnia Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0024 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 9 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podobovets Wooden Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-212-0059 Halych Catle RB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

File:26-212-0059_Halych_Catle_RB_24.jpg|User talk:Rbrechko/Promotion

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats on the Ros river near Khreshchatyk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Children's playground in the sanatorium park in Shklo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pidzamochok Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hubkiv Castle 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zarichchia Monument RB 46-215-0087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Vertical perspective distortion (tilt to the left), fixable? --F. Riedelio 08:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you. I've fixed it and uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 02:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trybukhivtsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Negrovets Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Annunciation, Vilkhivtsi, Ukraine, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 10, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drohobych Tysy RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serednie Castle RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-244-0068 Kniahynychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0004 Pidhaitsi Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0005 Pidhaitsi Synagogue RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:46, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0022 Pidhaitsi Berezhanska 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drohobych Magnolii RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livchytsi Aleya Vikovyh Lyp i Dubiv RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:33, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halytskyi NNP RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-5002 Vyshnia Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drohobych Sribliasti Smereky RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-248-0064 Pidhaitsi Maidan Nezalezhnosti 29 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 08:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the church of the Nativity of the Theotokos, Ruda, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 7, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medukha Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sniatyn Shevchenka 141 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sniatyn Catholic Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drohobych Park Kultyry i Vidpochynku RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horishnie Zaluchchia Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is a bit dark, would benefit from slight perspective correction, and you should retouch the branches at the upper edge. --Plozessor 05:40, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, I uploaded new version. --Rbrechko 22:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:44, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Castle 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sniatyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Velyki Hlibovychi, Ukraine, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint Michael church, Nehrovets, Ukraine, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of the church of the Dormition, Velyki Hlibovychi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Bernardine Monastery 2 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarakaniv Fort RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Carmelite monastery 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Castle 3 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Castle 4 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sniatyn Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Belfry of Church of St Jan Nepomuk RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:55, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Church of St Jan Nepomuk RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Rozdil, Ukraine, view from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint Paraskeva church, Ustechko, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Children's playground in the sanatorium park in Shklo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Children's playground in the sanatorium park in Shklo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vynohradiv Chorna Hora RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-212-5021 Porokhova Travertine Rock RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:21, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-224-5032 Vyshnivets Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steblivka Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pykulovychi Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Church of St George RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support The left part is a bit noisy but still good. --Plozessor 05:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-236-5002 NNP Hutsulshchyna RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-208-5004 Kasperivskyi Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:41, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 61-234-5034 Kremenets Mountains RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:53, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berezhnytsia Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 18:55, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sokilets Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyshnivets Park 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-215-5007 Piddnistriany Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staryi Yar Vikovi Duby RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-258-0020 Staryi Yar Wooden Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit tight above and below but Good quality. --Cayambe 07:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Our Lady of the Rosary, Medukha, Ukraine, view from NE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Berezhanska Street 2, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-215-5003 Khodoriv Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-5005 Zaklad Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-227-5003 Zhovkva Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 12:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Berezhanska Street 11, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanckoroński Palace in Khodoriv, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Savior Transfiguration Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 18:17, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Lutsk Gate RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 18:17, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint Nicholas church, Podobovets, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 26-248-5023 Grofa Reserve RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Coodinates would be helpful. --Milseburg 20:24, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Rbrechko 21:16, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Thanks, good qulity and interesting. --Milseburg 16:24, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:26-212-0059 Halych Catle RB 24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:26-212-0059 Halych Catle RB 24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Synagogue RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:17, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Bell Tower of Church of St George RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:17, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno Bernardine Monastery 1 RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:15, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubno St Elias Cathedral RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:15, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-230-5008 Rozdil Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Berezhanska Street 1, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial sign to the abolition of serfdom in Vilkhivtsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-209-5004 Velykyi Lubin Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 20:45, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oleksandrivka Bell Tower RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46-253-5007 Berezhnytsia Park RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oleksandrivka Church RB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Purple CA around the top of the building --Plozessor 04:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support It's minor, overall good to me. --Sebring12Hrs 13:16, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» у 2025 році презентує проєкт завантаження документів на Вікісховище!

[edit]

Запрошуємо взяти участь у новому проєкті завантаження документів!

Мета проєкту — створити онлайн-базу документів про природно-заповідний фонд України: надання та скасування статусу, зміну меж, перейменування, закріплення за користувачами тощо.

⌛️Коли? Проєкт триватиме з 1 квітня по 31 травня включно.

📌Як взяти участь? Ознайомтесь з інструкцією та анонсуйте свою участь на сторінці. Робіть внесок та нараховуйте свої бали!

Найактивнішим учасникам та учасницям передбачені сертифікати в онлайн-магазин. Усі учасники й учасниці зможуть отримати офіційний сертифікат участі від ГО «Вікімедіа Україна» в електронному та/чи паперовому форматі та сувеніри із символікою Вікіпедії та «Вікі любить Землю».

А щоб ознайомитись з правилами кампанії на практиці, запрошуємо відвідати вебінар від членкині організаційної команди Людмили Сломінської, який відбудеться в суботу 5 квітня о 12:00. Реєстрація за посиланням.

Якщо ви б хотіли долучитись до проєкту у складі організаційної команди або у разі інших запитань — пишіть за адресою wledocs@wikimedia.org.ua.


Більше інформації про участь, призи та критерії завантаження читайте на сторінці кампанії.

– З повагою, оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».

Sent by Aafi on behalf of Olesia Lukaniuk. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Boats on the Ros river near Khreshchatyk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boats on the Ros river near Khreshchatyk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House on Independence Square 3, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]